The August 13 statement by Rosgidromet added further evidence to reports that the test at the Nyonoksa range on the White Sea released not only toxic missile fuel but also unspecified radioactive material.
The August 8 incident continues to be dogged by confusion and misinformation from local and federal officials, both about the exact death toll but also what exactly was being tested.
The Kremlin on August 13 gave its first statement about the mishap, although spokesman Dmitry Peskov gave little new information about whether the explosion was the result of a test on a new nuclear-powered missile, as some U.S. analysts have pointed to.
“Accidents, unfortunately, happen. These are tragedies. And in this case it is important for us to remember those heroes who lost their lives as a result of these accidents,” Peskov was quoted by Russian news agencies as saying.
Residents of the city of Severodvinsk, a shipbuilding port located around 30 kilometers from the test site, reportedly bought out iodine drops from city pharmacies in the hours after the first reports emerged; iodine is often taken to protect the thyroid gland from some types of radiation.
Increase in radiation
In its statement published by the state news agency TASS, Rosgidomet cited data collected by a northern regional monitoring agency, saying that gamma radiation levels jumped by 4 to 16 times normal levels in Severodvinsk on August 8. TASS also quoted an official with the state-run nuclear agency Rosatom as saying the levels were harmless for humans.
An earlier report published on August 8 by Arkhangelsk regional emergency officials said radiation levels had risen to 20 times normal levels. That report was circulated by the environmental group Greenpeace.
The Severodvinsk city administration had also published a statement on August 8 reporting an increase in radiation, though that statement was later taken down from its website.
Russian news media reported that shipping would be restricted in the Dvina Bay, where Nyonoksa and Arkhangelsk are located, for several weeks due to toxic rocket fuel leaking into the water.
In a video published on a Sarov news website on August 11, Vyacheslav Solovyov, a nuclear researcher at the main nuclear research facility in Sarov, said the researchers had been investigating, among other things “the creation of small-scale sources of energy using radioactive fissile materials.”
U.S. analysts have focused on a possible nuclear-powered cruise missile that was being tested, something that President Vladimir Putin last year announced was under development.
In a post to Twitter on August 12, U.S. President Donald Trump also asserted the incident was a failed test of a missile prototype nicknamed Skyfall by NATO experts, though he gave no evidence.
The scattered and contradictory information about what exactly happened has led to speculation in and out of Russia that the mishap was far worse than officials have revealed.
In its latest statement on the incident, Norway’s radiation-monitoring agency on August 12 said that it hadn’t recorded any uptick in radiation levels by its monitoring equipment. Norway shares a border with Russia on the Kola Peninsula, some 700 kilometers to the northeast of Severodvinsk.